three→one
Taste, decoded

Three picks.
One perfect match.

Choose three movies or shows you genuinely loved. We find the connection underneath them, then surface the next watch that fits that pattern best.

01
02
03
Not sure where to start?
Tonight:

Under the hood

It hunts for the hidden reason you liked all three.

01

Intersection or bridge

A small embedding model runs locally and first measures how closely your three picks relate. Tight tastes use intersection mode; eclectic tastes use bridge mode to find the strongest connective tissue.

02

Two-way graph evidence

A candidate gets a major boost when multiple picks independently point to it. Finalists are also checked in reverse, so reciprocal recommendation links count as stronger evidence.

03

Escape the graph

Shared catalog themes are used to search outside the obvious recommendation lists, so unusual cross-genre and movie-to-TV matches can enter the race.

04

Story + emotional texture

It separates what a story is about from how it feels: intimacy, folklore, mentorship, obsession, warmth, darkness, contemplation and propulsion can all change the ranking.

05

Creative DNA

Cast, directors, creators and collaborators help, but they never get to overpower the story-level match.

06

Anti-clone ranking

The final shortlist is diversified so six near-identical recommendations cannot crowd out a stronger sideways discovery.